<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Voting Reform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mterry.name/log/2005/10/27/voting-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mterry.name/log/2005/10/27/voting-reform/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:47:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://mterry.name/log/2005/10/27/voting-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2005 22:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mterry.name/log/?p=235#comment-154</guid>
		<description>Things are definitely getting even LESS competitive.  We&#039;ve just released a couple of reports.  This one might interest you:

http://www.fairvote.org/blog/?p=8</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Things are definitely getting even LESS competitive.  We&#8217;ve just released a couple of reports.  This one might interest you:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fairvote.org/blog/?p=8" rel="nofollow">http://www.fairvote.org/blog/?p=8</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://mterry.name/log/2005/10/27/voting-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2005 02:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mterry.name/log/?p=235#comment-144</guid>
		<description>Well, fair enough.  But it&#039;s not like they are hurt by this either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, fair enough.  But it&#8217;s not like they are hurt by this either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dav</title>
		<link>http://mterry.name/log/2005/10/27/voting-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Dav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2005 01:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mterry.name/log/?p=235#comment-143</guid>
		<description>But where does that leave the Libertarians? :( I can&#039;t imagine them endorsing either a Republican or a Democrat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But where does that leave the Libertarians? <img src='http://mterry.name/log/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  I can&#8217;t imagine them endorsing either a Republican or a Democrat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://mterry.name/log/2005/10/27/voting-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2005 01:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mterry.name/log/?p=235#comment-142</guid>
		<description>I like the idea.  It lets third parties ramp up.  They can consistently put themselves out there without necessarily looking like losers, raise awareness, and build a base.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea.  It lets third parties ramp up.  They can consistently put themselves out there without necessarily looking like losers, raise awareness, and build a base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dav</title>
		<link>http://mterry.name/log/2005/10/27/voting-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Dav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 17:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mterry.name/log/?p=235#comment-140</guid>
		<description>Interesting. Seems like a compromise between our current system (in that it perpetuates the two dominant parties) and a more ideal system (in that it encourages &quot;safe&quot; third party voting). I&#039;m not sure if I think it&#039;s a good idea or not. On the one hand, anything is better than what we have now. On the other hand, it might be a temporary fix with which enough people are satisfied that a more ideal system is never put into place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. Seems like a compromise between our current system (in that it perpetuates the two dominant parties) and a more ideal system (in that it encourages &#8220;safe&#8221; third party voting). I&#8217;m not sure if I think it&#8217;s a good idea or not. On the one hand, anything is better than what we have now. On the other hand, it might be a temporary fix with which enough people are satisfied that a more ideal system is never put into place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://mterry.name/log/2005/10/27/voting-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 15:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mterry.name/log/?p=235#comment-139</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s some interesting stuff going on in this regard at the state level. Back in 2004, New York instituted a policy wherein minor parties had the option of running their own candidate for state office, or officially endorsing a candidate from another party. So, you can vote, say, Green, but it counts towards a democratic candidate. This actually goes a long way towards building up the support base of third parties. The Working Families party has done a pretty good job of using this system, and they talk more about this voting system &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.workingfamiliesparty.org/fusion.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt;

Apparently, there&#039;s an effort to get this kind of system put in place in Massachusetts. I ended up signing some petition to that effect, so maybe it will come up as a ballot initiative this or next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s some interesting stuff going on in this regard at the state level. Back in 2004, New York instituted a policy wherein minor parties had the option of running their own candidate for state office, or officially endorsing a candidate from another party. So, you can vote, say, Green, but it counts towards a democratic candidate. This actually goes a long way towards building up the support base of third parties. The Working Families party has done a pretty good job of using this system, and they talk more about this voting system <a href="http://www.workingfamiliesparty.org/fusion.html" rel="nofollow">here.</a></p>
<p>Apparently, there&#8217;s an effort to get this kind of system put in place in Massachusetts. I ended up signing some petition to that effect, so maybe it will come up as a ballot initiative this or next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

